Evaluate a source's credibility using authority, currency, accuracy, and purpose, and integrate a quotation into an argument using a signal phrase and basic MLA in-text citation.
Not all sources deserve equal trust, and a strong researcher evaluates before citing. Four questions help: authority (who wrote this, and what makes them qualified?), currency (how recent is it, and does that matter for this subject?), accuracy (can its specific claims be verified against other credible sources?), and purpose (is the source trying to inform fairly, or persuade, sell, or provoke, and does that purpose shape what it includes or leaves out?).
Once a credible source is chosen, it has to be integrated honestly. Paraphrasing is restating an idea in your own words and sentence structure, not simply swapping a few words in the original sentence -- swapping words while keeping the original structure is still a form of plagiarism, even if unintentional. A direct quotation should be introduced with a signal phrase naming the source or author, and followed by a basic MLA in-text citation, typically the author's last name and a page number in parentheses. Every quotation or paraphrased idea taken from a source needs both a signal phrase and a citation -- the reader should never have to guess where an idea came from.
Mastery looks like: They can evaluate a source using all four credibility questions and correctly integrate a quotation with a signal phrase and MLA in-text citation.
Common stumbles: Treating a close paraphrase, same structure, different words, as sufficiently original; quoting or paraphrasing an idea without a citation because it was not a word-for-word quote.
See it visually
Interactive, spoken-aloud tools that show this idea in motion.