Use indirect characterization to analyze Atticus Finch's moral code as revealed through his actions, his own words, and other characters' reactions to him.
Atticus Finch is characterized almost entirely indirectly, through STEAL, the same toolkit studied in Week 3, now applied at a novel's scale. His actions, agreeing to defend Tom Robinson despite the town's open disapproval, reveal a commitment to fairness that costs him socially. His own words to Scout give the clearest statement of his moral code directly: he tells her that "you never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view... until you climb into his skin and walk around in it" -- empathy as a discipline, not just a feeling.
Other characters' reactions complete the portrait. Some neighbors respect Atticus deeply for his integrity; others scorn or threaten him for defending a Black man in a racially unequal legal system. That range of reactions is itself indirect characterization -- it shows a man whose principles put him at odds with parts of his own community, and it lets the reader measure his consistency by how he treats people who agree with him and people who do not, equally.
Mastery looks like: They can apply STEAL specifically to Atticus and explain his moral code using both his stated words and his actions under social pressure.
Common stumbles: Treating Atticus's "climb into his skin" line as the whole characterization by itself, without also citing his actions and other characters' reactions as supporting indirect evidence.
See it visually
Interactive, spoken-aloud tools that show this idea in motion.