Describe bivariate data with scatter plots, judge correlation, and match a data pattern to a linear, quadratic, or exponential model.
A scatter plot shows two variables at once, one point per pair. The pattern reveals correlation: points trending up together are positively correlated, trending in opposite directions are negatively correlated, and a shapeless cloud shows no real correlation at all. A line of best fit estimates the trend, and a residual (actual value minus predicted value) measures how far any one real point strays from that trend line - small residuals mean a good-fitting model.
Correlation is not causation: two variables can move together because a hidden "lurking" variable drives them both (ice cream sales and drownings both rise in summer - heat drives both, one does not cause the other). This term also gave you three model shapes - spot which one fits a pattern by checking its differences: a constant FIRST difference means linear, a constant RATIO means exponential, and a constant SECOND difference (the differences of the differences) means quadratic.
Mastery looks like: They classify correlation from a scatter plot, distinguish correlation from causation, and identify whether a numeric pattern is linear, quadratic, or exponential.
Common stumbles: Assuming any correlation implies causation; checking only first differences and mislabeling an exponential pattern as "not linear, so it must be quadratic."