Explain how a story's point of view controls what readers know, and analyze the specific effect of following an animal's limited understanding.
Point of view is not just "who tells the story" -- it is a decision about exactly what a reader is allowed to know and when. The Call of the Wild makes an unusual choice: the narrator sometimes steps back to explain the human world (the Klondike gold rush that created huge demand for strong sled dogs) but otherwise stays close to Buck's own senses and instincts, and never enters any human character's mind directly.
This creates a specific, powerful effect. We readers understand things Buck never does -- that Manuel stole him to pay a gambling debt, that a gold rush created the entire market that put him in danger. Buck experiences only the betrayal and the pain, with no comprehension of the human reasons behind it. That gap between what we know and what Buck knows builds sympathy for him precisely because he cannot understand the forces controlling his life.
Mastery looks like: They can explain specifically what a story's point of view allows a reader to know, and identify a clear gap between reader-knowledge and character-knowledge.
Common stumbles: Labeling a point of view correctly (first person, third person) without being able to explain the specific effect that choice has on the reader.
See it visually
Interactive, spoken-aloud tools that show this idea in motion.