Write a strict, evidence-only summary of a short story that excludes predictions, opinions, and any outcome the text does not actually state.
An objective summary reports only what a text actually says -- no guesses about what happens next, no opinions about what should happen, and nothing invented to fill a gap the writer left on purpose. This gets harder, not easier, with a story that has an ambiguous or open ending, because the temptation to "finish" the story in your summary is strong. Resisting that temptation is exactly the skill this week builds.
Frank Stockton's "The Lady, or the Tiger?" is the perfect stress test for objective summary, because the text deliberately refuses to say which door the young man opened. A summary that says "and he was killed by the tiger" or "and he happily married the lady" has added information the story never provides -- no matter how likely either guess might feel.
Mastery looks like: They can write a complete objective summary of an ambiguous story without inventing an ending or slipping in a personal opinion.
Common stumbles: Filling in a guessed ending as though it were a stated fact, especially with stories that deliberately leave the outcome open.
See it visually
Interactive, spoken-aloud tools that show this idea in motion.