Generate an independent, arguable thesis about how The Great Gatsby complicates the self-made-man ideal studied in Franklin, and support it with a full literary analysis essay using the novel's symbols as evidence.
Benjamin Franklin's Autobiography, studied in Week 7, helped build one of the most durable ideals in American self-conception: that industry, discipline, and will can let anyone remake themselves regardless of birth. James Gatz, born poor, genuinely reinvents himself into Jay Gatsby through relentless will, exactly as that ideal promises. But the novel complicates the ideal at nearly every turn: Gatsby's reinvention rests on illusion and, increasingly, on criminal wealth, built entirely to win back Daisy, a married woman from a fixed, inherited upper class that will never fully accept him no matter how much money he accumulates or how spectacular his parties become. Where Franklin's self-made man rises through visible, honest industry into genuine belonging, Gatsby's rise buys him proximity to wealth but never the acceptance he is actually chasing.
The novel's famous final lines reframe the American Dream itself as a beautiful, perhaps permanently unreachable illusion: "So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past." This week's task is to generate an original, specific, arguable thesis about how the novel complicates or critiques the Franklin-era ideal of self-invention through effort, using the green light, the Valley of Ashes, and the Eckleburg eyes, studied last week, as your supporting evidence -- the same full essay process (thesis, organized evidence, conclusion that extends rather than restates) practiced earlier this year with Thoreau's argumentative structure.
Mastery looks like: They can generate a specific, arguable thesis about the novel's critique of the self-made-man ideal and support it with organized symbol-based evidence across a full essay.
Common stumbles: Writing a thesis that only restates the topic ("this novel is about the American Dream") instead of an arguable claim; using a symbol as decoration in a paragraph rather than as actual evidence supporting the stated thesis.
See it visually
Interactive, spoken-aloud tools that show this idea in motion.