Distinguish narrative points of view and identify the specific gap between what a first-person narrator claims and what the evidence supports.
Point of view is the vantage point a story is told from. First person ("I") puts you inside one mind and only that mind. Third-person limited follows one character closely but from outside. Third-person omniscient can move between minds and knows more than any single character does. The choice is never neutral -- it decides exactly what a reader is allowed to know and when.
An unreliable narrator is a first-person narrator whose account cannot be fully trusted, whether they are lying, mistaken, or simply too disturbed to see clearly. The gap between what the narrator insists and what the details actually support is where the real story lives. Poe's "The Tell-Tale Heart" opens with the narrator declaring his own sanity -- "you fancy me mad" -- while every sentence that follows undercuts the claim.
Mastery looks like: They can name the three points of view accurately and identify a specific contradiction between an unreliable narrator's claims and the story's evidence.
Common stumbles: Treating "unreliable narrator" as simply "the narrator is lying" rather than examining the specific gap between claim and evidence; confusing first-person with third-limited.
See it visually
Interactive, spoken-aloud tools that show this idea in motion.