Demonstrate this unit's core skills -- close reading a claim, naming ethos/pathos/logos, evaluating evidence, spotting fallacies, and checking a source -- on unfamiliar material.
This is a checkpoint week: the goal is showing that this unit's rhetorical toolkit now works on material you have never seen before, not just on the Declaration, Henry, Anthony, and the Gettysburg Address you have already studied closely.
Every skill from this unit answers a version of the same underlying question: what is this text actually claiming, how is it trying to convince me, and should it? That question works on a founding document, a nineteenth-century speech, a modern op-ed, or an advertisement equally well.
Mastery looks like: They can identify a claim, name its persuasive techniques, and evaluate its evidence on a passage they have not previously studied.
Common stumbles: Successfully analyzing only the unit's already-studied examples but struggling to transfer the same skills to genuinely new material; naming a fallacy or appeal without explaining specifically why it applies.
See it visually
Interactive, spoken-aloud tools that show this idea in motion.