Eighth Grade · History · week 33

Plans for Reconstruction

Compare Lincoln's, Johnson's, and the Radical Republicans' plans for Reconstruction, and explain the impact of Lincoln's assassination on that process.

Even before the war ended, Lincoln began planning how to rebuild the Union. His Ten Percent Plan (1863) was deliberately lenient: a southern state could form a new government once just 10 percent of its 1860 voters swore an oath of loyalty to the Union. Many Republicans in Congress thought this was far too easy on states that had just rebelled, and passed the stricter Wade-Davis Bill (1864), requiring a majority of voters to take the loyalty oath; Lincoln refused to sign it, leaving the two sides still disagreeing over how lenient Reconstruction should be when the war ended in April 1865.

Just five days after General Lee's surrender at Appomattox Courthouse, Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth on April 14, 1865, at Ford's Theatre. Vice President Andrew Johnson became president and pursued an even more lenient "Presidential Reconstruction," pardoning many former Confederate leaders and allowing southern states to pass restrictive Black Codes that limited freed people's rights and reintroduced conditions close to slavery in practice. Furious Republicans in Congress, known as Radical Republicans, took control of Reconstruction themselves starting in 1867 with the Reconstruction Acts, dividing the South into military districts and requiring former Confederate states to guarantee Black men the right to vote before rejoining the Union; the conflict grew so bitter that the House impeached Johnson in 1868, though the Senate failed to convict him by a single vote. Meanwhile, the Freedmen's Bureau, created in 1865, worked across the South providing food, medical care, education, and help negotiating labor contracts and reuniting families separated by slavery.

📋 For the teacher
Teach it (10–15 min):
  • Line up the four plans (Lincoln's, Congress's Wade-Davis, Johnson's, Congress's Radical Reconstruction) on a simple lenient-to-strict scale -- seeing the spectrum makes the conflict between president and Congress much clearer.
  • Take real care naming Black Codes accurately and honestly -- they were a genuine attempt to re-create conditions close to slavery through legal means, not a minor inconvenience.
  • Discuss why Congress and the president disagreeing this sharply over Reconstruction led to an actual impeachment -- checks and balances (week 7) in dramatic, real action.
  • Give the Freedmen's Bureau its due as a genuinely important, underappreciated institution -- food, medical care, education, and reuniting families were real, practical help.
Talk about it:
  • Why might Lincoln have wanted a lenient Reconstruction plan, given how bitter the war had just been?
  • Was it right for Congress to override the president's Reconstruction approach through the Reconstruction Acts of 1867? Why or why not?
  • What does the near-impeachment of Andrew Johnson reveal about how deeply the branches of government can disagree?

Mastery looks like: They can compare at least three different Reconstruction plans (Lincoln's, Johnson's, Congress's) and explain how Lincoln's assassination changed Reconstruction's direction.

Common stumbles: Assuming Reconstruction followed one single, consistent plan throughout, rather than understanding it shifted dramatically after Lincoln's death and through an ongoing fight between the president and Congress.

Homework for this lessonType it, write it with a stylus, or print it for pencil & paper.open →
Records attendance + 15 min of History for this learner.
← Back to todayAll coursesYear planner