Revise the draft to replace informal language with a formal academic tone and add transitions that clarify the logical relationships between ideas.
Argument essays use a more formal voice than a text message or a diary entry: no slang, no filler words like "like" or "stuff," and not constantly addressing the reader as "you." Formal does not mean boring or stuffed with big words for their own sake -- it means clear, precise, and serious about the topic.
Transitions are the connective tissue between ideas. Words such as "furthermore," "in contrast," "as a result," and "therefore" tell the reader HOW two ideas relate -- adding on, disagreeing, causing, or concluding -- instead of leaving the reader to guess. This week: hunt the draft for informal language to upgrade, and add a transition wherever the logical link between ideas is not obvious yet.
Mastery looks like: They revise a draft to remove slang and filler language and insert transitions that correctly signal the logical relationship between ideas.
Common stumbles: Confusing "formal" with just using bigger, fancier words instead of clearer, more precise ones; adding transition words randomly without checking that the logical relationship actually matches.
See it visually
Interactive, spoken-aloud tools that show this idea in motion.