Seventh Grade · Science · week 23

Natural selection evidence

Explain the mechanism of natural selection -- variation, heredity, differential survival and reproduction, and resulting change in trait frequency -- using the peppered moth case as documented evidence.

Natural selection is the process by which populations change over generations, and it works through four linked ideas. First, individuals within a population naturally vary in their traits. Second, some of that variation is heritable, meaning it can be passed to offspring. Third, in a given environment, some variations make survival and successful reproduction more likely than others. Fourth, individuals with those favorable variations tend to leave more offspring, so those traits become more common in the population over time. It is important to be precise here: natural selection acts on populations across generations, not on a single organism changing during its own lifetime, and the environment does not create new variation -- it "selects" among variation that already exists in the population from mutation and inherited differences.

One of the most thoroughly documented examples is the peppered moth in England. Before the mid-1800s, the light-colored form of the moth was far more common, since it was well camouflaged against light, lichen-covered tree bark, while a darker form existed but was rare, since it stood out to bird predators on that light bark. During the Industrial Revolution, soot from factories darkened tree trunks and killed the lichen in many areas. In those newly sooty areas, the dark moths became better camouflaged and the light moths became easier for birds to spot; over subsequent generations, researchers recorded the proportion of dark moths rising sharply in polluted areas. After pollution-control laws reduced soot in the mid-1900s, recorded surveys showed the light-colored form becoming more common again in those same areas.

📋 For the teacher
Teach it (10–15 min):
  • Walk through the four numbered steps slowly and separately -- variation, heritability, differential survival, resulting change -- since folding them together too fast is the most common source of confusion.
  • Present the peppered moth case the same way you would present any other well-documented set of historical scientific data: what was measured, what changed, and why.
  • Compare directly back to last week's selective breeding: both change trait frequency over generations, but a human chooses in selective breeding, while survival and reproduction in a given environment do the "choosing" in natural selection.
  • If they say something like "the moths wanted to survive so they turned dark," gently walk back through step 1: the dark moths were already there before the environment changed.
Talk about it:
  • How is natural selection similar to selective breeding, and how is it different?
  • Why does "the moths changed color to hide better" describe the wrong mechanism, even though the moth population really did change?
  • Why do you think it took careful counting of moths over many years, rather than one quick look, to document this case?

Mastery looks like: They can explain all four parts of the natural selection mechanism using the peppered moth case and correctly identify the flaw in an individual-level ("moths decided to change") misstatement.

Common stumbles: Describing natural selection as an individual organism intentionally changing during its life; assuming the environment creates the new variation rather than selecting among variation that already existed.

Homework for this lessonType it, write it with a stylus, or print it for pencil & paper.open →
Records attendance + 15 min of Science for this learner.
← Back to todayAll coursesYear planner