Seventh Grade · Reading · week 8

Novel Seminar: The Call of the Wild

Participate in an open-ended, evidence-based discussion synthesizing the whole novel's setting, plot, characters, point of view, and theme.

A seminar is different from a quiz. There is rarely one right answer -- the goal is to build understanding together by putting your evidence next to someone else's and seeing where they agree, disagree, or sharpen each other. This week has no new reading. Instead, you revisit the whole novel and prepare to discuss its biggest, most debatable questions.

The central question worth sitting with: is Buck's ending a triumph or a loss? He gains freedom, strength, and a place leading his own kind -- but he also loses Thornton, the one being who ever earned his full love, and he loses every trace of the tame, gentler dog he once was. A strong seminar answer does not just pick a side; it uses specific evidence from setting, plot, character, and theme -- everything studied these past seven weeks -- to defend it.

📋 For the teacher
Teach it (10–15 min):
  • Sit in the discussion as a genuine participant, not just a quiz-giver -- offer your own honest answer to the triumph-or-loss question and let your student push back on it.
  • If the conversation stalls, ask "what evidence would change your mind?" rather than simply supplying your own answer.
  • Word study: "synthesis" means combining separate pieces of understanding into one larger, connected idea -- exactly what a good seminar produces that a list of isolated facts cannot.
  • Keep this conversational and unhurried. The goal is depth of thinking, not covering a fixed list of points in order.
Talk about it:
  • Did anyone change their mind about the ending during this conversation? What evidence caused that shift?
  • What is the difference between a seminar and a quiz, and why might a novel like this one deserve the seminar treatment?
  • Which of this unit's tools -- setting, subplot, foils, point of view, annotation, theme, scene versus chapter -- felt most useful for talking about the ending?

Mastery looks like: They can defend a position about the novel using specific evidence from at least three different weeks' worth of tools (for example, theme plus point of view plus a specific scene).

Common stumbles: Offering an opinion about the ending with no specific textual evidence, or restating plot instead of building an argument from it.

See it visually

Interactive, spoken-aloud tools that show this idea in motion.

Homework for this lessonType it, write it with a stylus, or print it for pencil & paper.open →
Records attendance + 15 min of Reading for this learner.
← Back to todayAll coursesYear planner