Follow a multi-step argument in logical order, showing how each step depends on the step before it.
Some arguments are not just a pile of separate reasons -- they are a chain, where each step only makes sense if you have already accepted the step before it. Knock out one link, and everything built on top of it falls too. Reading this kind of argument means tracing the path from one statement to the next and checking that each step actually follows from the last.
Susan B. Anthony's 1873 speech "Is It a Crime for a Citizen of the United States to Vote?" -- delivered after she was arrested for voting in a presidential election -- builds exactly this kind of chain. She does not simply list reasons why women should vote; she builds one strict logical staircase, step by step, from the Constitution's own words.
Mastery looks like: They can trace a multi-step argument and explain specifically which earlier step each later step depends on.
Common stumbles: Treating a chained argument like a simple list of separate reasons, missing that rejecting one early step should logically undo everything built on top of it.
See it visually
Interactive, spoken-aloud tools that show this idea in motion.