Evaluate whether a source is credible by checking the author, date, purpose, and evidence, and compare a reliable source to an unreliable one.
Not everything written down is trustworthy. Before you use a source in research, run four quick checks: WHO wrote it, an expert or anyone at all? WHEN was it written, recent enough to be accurate, especially for fast-changing topics? WHY was it written, to inform you honestly, or to sell you something or convince you of an opinion? WHAT evidence backs it up, real facts and data, or just claims?
A reliable source usually names its author and their expertise, is reasonably current, aims to inform rather than persuade or sell, and backs up claims with real evidence. An unreliable source might be anonymous, out of date, clearly trying to sell something, or full of claims with no evidence at all.
Mastery looks like: They independently run the who, when, why, evidence check on a new source and give a reasoned credibility judgment.
Common stumbles: Assuming anything that sounds official or is professionally designed must be credible.