Research a live policy question and argue it in writing with mechanisms, evidence, and a steelmanned opposition.
Eighteen weeks of tools become one piece of citizenship. Choose a live policy question with real stakes: raise the local minimum wage? Rent control downtown? A tariff on imported solar panels? Universal free community college? Your job is not to have an opinion โ you had those for free before this course. Your job is an ARGUMENT: claim, mechanism, evidence, and an honest reckoning with the other side.
Structure: (1) the question and who's affected; (2) your claim; (3) the economic mechanism โ walk it through supply/demand, incentives, opportunity cost, the tools by name; (4) evidence โ at least three sources, at least one that cuts AGAINST you; (5) the steelman โ the opposition's best case argued so well they'd nod, and your response to it; (6) what you'd watch after enactment to know if you were wrong. That last section is what separates thinkers from talkers.
Mastery looks like: A finished essay/presentation with named mechanisms, honest sources, a genuine steelman, and a falsifier.
Common stumbles: Opinion with citations instead of argument with mechanisms; strawmanning; treating the assignment as settled once submitted.