Compute torque from a force and lever arm, including at an angle, and apply rotational equilibrium to solve for an unknown force or distance.
Torque is the rotational equivalent of force -- it is what causes (or prevents) an object from starting to spin around a pivot. Torque = F*r*sin(theta), where r is the distance from the pivot to where the force is applied and theta is the angle between that distance and the force itself; equivalently, torque = F*d, where d is the perpendicular distance from the pivot to the force's line of action (the "lever arm" or "moment arm"). Both a bigger force and a bigger distance from the pivot increase torque, which is exactly why a longer wrench handle makes loosening a stubborn bolt easier using the very same push.
Just as an object in translational equilibrium has zero net force, an object in rotational equilibrium has zero net torque -- both conditions are needed for something to be genuinely static, like a balanced seesaw, a hanging sign, or a stable bridge. It is entirely possible for forces to balance (translational equilibrium) while torques do not, which would cause an object to spin even though it does not accelerate sideways -- the two equilibrium conditions are independent checks, not one guaranteeing the other.
Mastery looks like: They compute torque correctly (including when a force is not perpendicular to the lever arm) and solve a rotational-equilibrium problem for an unknown force or distance.
Common stumbles: Using the full distance r instead of the true perpendicular lever arm when a force is applied at an angle; assuming rotational equilibrium is automatically satisfied whenever forces happen to balance.