Apply a repeatable annotation system to a short text and build one claim-evidence-analysis (CEA) paragraph from the marks made while reading.
Confident literary analysis starts with a habit, not a talent: annotating deliberately instead of reading passively. A reliable system might mark three things every time -- underline specific word choices or details that feel important, bracket the exact moment something shifts (a decision, a reversal, a reveal), and write a short margin note that turns a bare observation into a question or a possible inference. The goal is not to mark everything; over-annotating a page solid is really just re-reading with extra steps. The goal is to leave a trail your later self can follow straight to your evidence.
From annotation, a literary claim gets built in three stages, often shortened to CEA: Claim (the specific, arguable point), Evidence (the exact detail or quotation supporting it), and Analysis (the explanation of HOW that evidence proves the claim -- the step students skip most often). A quotation dropped into a paragraph with no analysis proves nothing by itself; it is the analysis sentence that does the actual intellectual work.
Mastery looks like: They can annotate a short unfamiliar passage using a consistent system and build a complete CEA paragraph in which the analysis sentence explains, rather than just restates, the evidence.
Common stumbles: Underlining so much of the page that nothing is actually prioritized; supplying a quotation with no analysis sentence and assuming the connection to the claim is self-evident.
See it visually
Interactive, spoken-aloud tools that show this idea in motion.