Tenth Grade · History · week 28

Turning the tide, and a reckoning at Nuremberg

Identify the major turning points of World War II, describe its end in Europe and the Pacific including the decision to use atomic bombs, and explain the significance of the Nuremberg Trials.

Several battles mark where World War II's momentum decisively shifted. In the Pacific, the US Navy's victory at the Battle of Midway (June 1942) blunted Japan's naval advantage for good. On the Eastern Front, the Battle of Stalingrad (August 1942-February 1943) ended in a catastrophic defeat for Germany and is widely considered the war's major turning point, after which Soviet forces steadily pushed westward. After Allied victories in North Africa and Italy's surrender in 1943, the long-awaited second front opened in the west on D-Day, June 6, 1944, when Allied forces launched history's largest seaborne invasion at Normandy, France.

Soviet forces reached Berlin in spring 1945, Hitler took his own life in his bunker on April 30, and Germany surrendered on May 8, 1945 (V-E Day). In the Pacific, brutal island-hopping battles at Iwo Jima and Okinawa suggested an invasion of Japan itself could cost enormous casualties on both sides -- a central argument President Truman weighed in deciding to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima (August 6, 1945) and Nagasaki (August 9, 1945), a decision historians still debate today: some emphasize the human cost an invasion would likely have caused, while others question whether Japan was already close to surrender and point to the terrible precedent of nuclear weapons' first use. Japan surrendered on August 15, 1945 (V-J Day). Afterward, the Nuremberg Trials (1945-1946) prosecuted major Nazi leaders for war crimes and crimes against humanity, establishing a landmark legal principle: individuals, including government and military officials, could be held personally accountable under international law even when they claimed to be "just following orders." That October, the United Nations was founded specifically to try to prevent a third world war -- a direct lesson learned from the League of Nations' failure in week 23.

📋 For the teacher
Teach it (10–15 min):
  • Build a simple turning-points timeline together (Midway, Stalingrad, D-Day) before discussing the war's actual end dates -- momentum and ending are two different things.
  • Present the atomic bomb decision as a genuinely still-debated historical question, walking through both major arguments fairly rather than delivering a single verdict.
  • Discuss the "just following orders" precedent from Nuremberg as hugely significant for later international law -- a thread worth remembering as the course reaches human rights later on.
  • Note the UN's founding purpose explicitly: preventing a third world war, learned directly from the League of Nations' failure in week 23.
Talk about it:
  • Why might it matter to historians to identify a war's "turning point" separately from its actual ending date?
  • Do you find the argument for or the argument against using the atomic bombs more persuasive? What additional information might change your view?
  • Why was establishing that "just following orders" is not a legal defense such an important precedent for the rest of the 20th century?

Mastery looks like: They can name at least two turning-point battles with explanations, summarize both sides of the atomic bomb debate fairly, and explain Nuremberg's "following orders" precedent.

Common stumbles: Treating the atomic bomb decision as a simple, uncontested choice rather than a genuinely debated historical question, or missing the distinction between a war's turning point and its final ending date.

Homework for this lessonType it, write it with a stylus, or print it for pencil & paper.open →
Records attendance + 15 min of History for this learner.
← Back to todayAll coursesYear planner